Showing posts with label ppsimmons. Show all posts
Showing posts with label ppsimmons. Show all posts

Sunday, June 17, 2012

Breaking! Obama DOES Support Chinese-style Forced Abortions!

By Heather Mathews for PPSIMMONS


The last time I wrote it was regarding women being dragged, beaten, and forced to have abortions by Chinese “Family Planning Officials”.  I mentioned Obama’s soft spot for Planned Parenthood and communism.  I asked how long it would be before he brought it here.  Now, we are one step closer to seeing Chinese-style “family planning” right here in the good ol’ USA.

The United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA) supports China’s one-child policy and has since day one.  It provides millions of dollars to the bureaucrats who implemented and enforce that policy through coercion, threats, extortion, kidnapping, and murder.  Sounds more like the Mafia to me.  Or Chicago politics.  The Obama Administration (led by one of those Chicago gangsters) is happily funding the UNFPA to the tune of FIFTY. MILLION. DOLLARS.

The UNFPA denied that forced abortions were taking place, and then claimed it was taking care of the problem with its “soothing presence.”  When it became public knowledge in 1994, they claimed to abandon the one-child policy.  In 1998, it was back and the UNFPA said that they would not be using coercive tactics.  In 2002, the UNFPA was discovered by the U.S. State Department and the Population Research Institute to be providing backup support for the one-child-policy and sharing offices with officials who were carrying it out.  U.S. Secretary of State Colin Powell stated, “UNFPA’s support of, and involvement in, China’s population-planning activities allows the Chinese government to implement more effectively its program of coercive abortion.”  UNFPA’s own website confirms that the organization is carrying out joint “family planning” programs with Chinese officials.

In Changsha City, the still-pregnant woman referenced in my previous post is still under guard at a hospital by between ten and twenty officials who are attempting to persuade her to abort her baby.  This follows earlier reports that another woman was forcibly aborted at seven months.  Even the Chinese public is outraged and demanding justice.

There are a number of people on internet forums discussing whether we should be sending money to these thugs to pay off this woman’s “fines” for her “illegal baby,” or staying out of foreign policy as it is “none of our business.”  I don’t think paying these brutes will prevent them from just raising the fine even higher so they can continue to bully her until she finally gives in just to make it stop.  This is only one woman among countless others who may be in the same predicament.  It is a noble idea, but ineffective in the long run, as officials may decide to raise everyone’s fines and publicize cases (true or not) to earn a quick buck.  

I also take issue with the concept of staying out of foreign policy as it is the whole point of the UN (not that I agree with their very existence.)  Nearly every government makes a point of getting involved, with the White House taking the lead.  There are numerous partisan “think-tanks” making foreign policy their sole mission.  The problem lies in the election and appointment of decision-makers and policy-shapers who either don’t know or don’t care about issues around the world that may eventually impact us negatively, and other leaders who are championing such heavy-handed tactics to force an evil worldview and corrupt practices on a blind, deaf, and dumb constituency.
Think long and hard about whom you are voting for in November and what they really have to say about the issues they believe in and policies they will enact, especially those that may contribute to the poor prognosis of American Christianity. Video: Bob Fu Calls the Official Who Is in Charge of Cao Ruyi's "Illegal Pregnancy" Issue

 

Hawaii Provides FREE "sex selective" Abortions of little girls

Live Action Video- Sex-Selection in America: Part 4 - Undercover in Hawaii

 

Stop the gendercide. Learn more at http://ProtectOurGirls.com

Tuesday, June 12, 2012

Women dragged, beaten, and forced to have abortions by Chinese “Family Planning Officials”


Is THIS what we have to look forward to?!?

By Heather Mathews for PPSIMMONS                                         June 12, 2012


On June 3rd, a woman in China, seven months pregnant, was beaten and dragged into a vehicle by a group of “Family Planning Officials” while her husband was at work.  Her crime was not paying RMB 40,000 (US $6,279) in fines for being pregnant when she already has had at least one child.1

Another woman is currently in danger of a forced abortion unless she pays the officials US $25,000 on top of the US $1500 she already paid.2

With Planned Parenthood being caught red-handed aiding women (actually undercover agents for Live Action) who requested information on obtaining sex-selective abortions3, Obama declaring that pregnancy is punishment4, and the aggressive nature of pro-choice activists5,6,7,8 who are demanding the right to “healthcare” (irony considering it is designed to end life and not preserve it,) the widespread use of such tactics by one of the fastest-growing economies and the largest holder of U.S. debt (they effectively own us) is nothing short of frightening.  As we know, China is a communist state.  Obama has considerable ties to communism.9 He has made his contempt of us well known, and he has a habit of singing the praises of Planned Parenthood.10 He seems to thoroughly enjoy bypassing Congress and writing Executive Orders11 that have no redeeming qualities (much like the person writing them.)  How long before he decides to bring Chinese-style “family planning” here?

1 Report: Chinese woman forcibly aborted at seven months (warning: extremely graphic)- http://www.lifesitenews.com/news/report-chinese-woman-forcibly-aborted-at-seven-months-warning-extremely-gra

2 Ibid

3 Live Action/Protect Our Girls- http://protectourgirls.com/

4 Barack Obama - "Punished with a baby!" Video- http://youtu.be/HB5Frgw0Fww

5 The Bible is Pro-Choice. Really.-

6 The Biblical God is NOT pro-life, he advocates child murder, infanticide, child abuse and abortion- http://www.evilbible.com/god%27s%20not%20pro-life.htm

7 I’m Not Sorry- http://www.imnotsorry.net/

8 Pastor Chuck Smith Calls Children a Liability and Endorses Birth Control

9 Barack Obama's communist connections

10 Obama praises Planned Parenthood in video

11 Current List of President Obama's Executive Orders

Monday, June 11, 2012

Canada Off the Deep-End, America is Next


By Heather Mathews for PPSIMMONS

In a report by Reuters dated Friday June 8, 2012, it is announced that a 63-year-old grandmother will go to court and may be treated as a criminal for protesting- peacefully- outside a Toronto abortion clinic.

Linda Gibbons, who had an abortion in 1970 before realizing it was wrong, has spent 10 out of the last 18 years in jail for protesting outside multiple Toronto clinics in defiance of what was supposed to be a temporary injunction in 1994.  The Supreme Court of Canada has ruled that the current case pending against her (Linda Dale Gibbons v. Her Majesty the Queen, #33813,) stemming from an arrest outside the Scott abortion clinic in 2008, can go on.  Ms. Gibbons argues that the police are “abusing the process” for continuing to use an 18-year-old temporary restraining order.  She is currently in prison for yet another “bubble-zone” violation.

Canada has no abortion law, and Prime Minister Stephen Harper (a conservative if you can believe it) is refusing to reopen the issue.

Maria Corsillo, the manager of the Scott clinic, erroneously refers to abortion as “health care.”  It is certainly not “care” for the unborn children being mutilated and sucked out of what is supposed to be the safest place on Earth and the only home they have ever known.  These babies are already practicing breathing within the amniotic fluid cushioning them.  Physicians already perform life-saving surgeries on babies in the womb to correct neural-tube defects, obstructions, hernias, and several other conditions.  These surgeries are performed at fetal gestations during which many women consider and obtain abortions.  So, who is defining whether or not these babies are living yet?

Psalm 139 (NIV)
13 For you created my inmost being; 
    you knit me together in my mother’s womb. 
14 I praise you because I am fearfully and wonderfully made;
    your works are wonderful, 
    I know that full well.
15 My frame was not hidden from you
    when I was made in the secret place,
    when I was woven together in the depths of the earth. 
16 Your eyes saw my unformed body;
    all the days ordained for me were written in your book
    before one of them came to be.

Isaiah 49 (NIV)
1Listen to me, you islands; 
    hear this, you distant nations:
Before I was born the LORD called me;
    from my mother’s womb he has spoken my name...
5 And now the LORD says—
    he who formed me in the womb to be his servant…



Wednesday, June 6, 2012

Live Action Continues to Uncover Sex-Selective Abortions


By Heather Mathews for PPSIMMONS      

I previously wrote about an undercover investigation of sex-selective abortion in Texas.  Now, Live Action has released another video that revealed two clinics in Arizona aiding women to obtain such “services,” although sex-selective abortion is a felony in Arizona.

At Camelback Family Planning in Phoenix and Tucson Women's Center in Tucson, abortion workers facilitated the cover-up after hearing the woman specifically request a sex-selective abortion.

The woman tells a counselor named Barb at the Camelback clinic that she already has a girl and wants to try for a boy.  Barb advises, “Don’t tell us that, because we don’t want to know.” Referring to the clinic’s abortion doctor, Gabrielle Goodrick, Barb said, “You can tell her, she’s gonna tell you the same thing, just: Don’t let it be down! She’s really good about that. You’ll like that about her.”1

Surgical assistant Francisco, at the Tucson clinic, tells the woman, “We could lose our license,” but then said “I’ll just forget about it…but just be sure not to mention it” to the abortion doctor.2

Live Action has sent the full footage from the Arizona clinics to the state Attorney General, Tom Horne, and to local law enforcement.3

Live Action president Lila Rose urges: “Sex-selective abortion is a global search-and-destroy mission against little girls that is spreading at an alarming rate. While we wait for Congress to pass the Prenatal Non-Discrimination Act to ban sex-selective abortion in the U.S., state authorities should vigorously enforce Arizona’s law. The clinics supporting sex-selective abortion should be investigated, prosecuted, defunded, and delicensed immediately.”4

On May 31, Live Action released another video of a Planned Parenthood worker at the Margaret Sanger clinic in New York City advising a woman to have either an amniocentesis or a CVS test (chorionic villus sampling) to determine the sex earlier than a standard ultrasound.5
New York City Undercover Video:

 Arizona Undercover Video:

 1-4 AZ Abortion Clinics Break Law to Abort Baby Girls in New Undercover Video

http://protectourgirls.com/az-abortion-clinics-break-law-to-abort-baby-girls-in-new-undercover-video/?option=media5

Planned Parenthood NY Headquarters Counsels for Sex-Selective Abortion http://protectourgirls.com/planned-parenthood-ny-headquarters-counsels-for-sex-selective-abortion/?option=media

Obama and His Worshipers: “Partial Birth Abortion is an Exercise in Liberty”

By Heather Mathews for PPSIMMONS         



On Tuesday May 29, 2012, (P)Resident Obama awarded the Presidential Medal of Freedom to retired Supreme Court Justice John Paul Stevens.  The Presidential Medal of Freedom, as Obama put it, is “the highest civilian honor this country can bestow.”  What, exactly, did Justice Stevens do to warrant such a high honor?

He wrote a Supreme Court opinion arguing that a woman was exercising her right to "liberty" when she hired a doctor to kill her child through the procedure known as partial-birth abortion.1

"That holding--that the word 'liberty' in the Fourteenth Amendment includes a woman’s right to make this difficult and extremely personal decision--makes it impossible for me to understand how a State has any legitimate interest in requiring a doctor to follow any procedure other than the one that he or she reasonably believes will best protect the woman in her exercise of this constitutional liberty," Justice Stevens wrote in his concurring opinion in Stenberg v. Carhart.2, 3  He also joined in the dissent on the Gonzales v. Carhart case, which upheld the ban on partial-birth abortion.4, 5

The official citation for Steven’s Medal of Freedom lauds him for his commitment to “the noble vision of our nation’s founders.”6

Noble?  Committing, or aiding and abetting, murder is noble?  No matter which way you look at it, the taking of a human life is undoubtedly one of the most heinous crimes one can think of taking part in.  It is a horrible thing when that person is an adult, horrifying when it is a child: why, then, is it considered “just another day at the office” for the abortion doctor or the people charged with legislating who is worthy of life?  Should we not be even more enraged and disgusted that the slaughtered unborn did not get a chance to say, “hey, what about MY right to life, liberty and pursuit of happiness?”  Does the fact that they are unable to physically speak for themselves relegate them to the land of the non-living?  What about the scores of botched abortions where the baby comes out screaming and crying, undoubtedly aware that something, or someone, was hurting them?  If the abortion advocates have seen one the many videos available on the internet of a partial-birth abortion, they would have nightmares for weeks- if they had a heart anyway.  Anyone who can watch that and still think, ‘eh, not worth saving, it’s not a living being anyway,’ must be the very embodiment of evil.  Obama celebrating evil with an award that the outside world would see as representative of the people of the United States is nothing short of inviting condemnation upon us all.


1 Obama Gives Medal of Freedom to Justice Who Called Partial-Birth Abortion Exercise of 'Liberty' http://cnsnews.com/news/article/obama-gives-medal-freedom-justice-who-called-partial-birth-abortion-exercise-liberty

2 Stevens, J., concurring, SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES,
 http://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/99-830.ZC.html

3 Opinion of the Court, SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES,
 http://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/99-830.ZO.html

4 Ginsburg, J., dissenting, SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES,
http://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/05-380.ZD.html

5 Justice Kennedy, Opinion of the Court, SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES, http://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/05-380.ZO.html


See also
http://www.jesus-issavior.com/Evils%20in%20America/Abortion%20is%20Murder/horror_of_abortion.htm
http://www.epm.org/resources/2010/Mar/2/biblical-perspectives-unborn-children/
http://www.prophecynewswatch.com/2012/May16/1681.html
http://www.prolifetraining.com/FiveMinute6.aspAbortion video: 
http://www.liveprayer.com/abortion2.cfm?v=abortionBaby cries for help during procedure- 12 weeks

 


Thursday, May 31, 2012

Liberals Support Sex-Selective Abortion (They Just Don’t Want to Admit It)

By Heather Mathews for PPSIMMONS         


 Last night, Jake Tapper of ABC News contacted White House Press Secretary Jay Carney for a statement on the current administration’s position regarding H.R. 3541, otherwise known as PRENDA (the Prenatal Non-Discrimination Act of 2012.)

Carney could not immediately provide a statement; however, deputy press secretary Jamie Smith responded in a later statement:

“The Administration opposes gender discrimination in all forms, but the end result of this legislation would be to subject doctors to criminal prosecution if they fail to determine the motivations behind a very personal and private decision. The government should not intrude in medical decisions or private family matters in this way.”1

What the administration fails to note- within Section 5 of the bill2:

RULE OF CONSTRUCTION- Nothing in this Act shall be construed to require that a healthcare provider has an affirmative duty to inquire as to the motivation for the abortion, absent the healthcare provider having knowledge or information that the abortion is being sought based on the sex or gender of the child.

Well, either way, the Obama administration is going to be a little ticked with the passage of this bill last night through the House Judiciary Committee by a vote of 20-133.  According to a press release issued by Arizona Congressman Trent Franks:

"The very bedrock foundational principle that gave birth to America was the conviction that all human beings are children of God and created equal in His sight. In 1847, Frederick Douglass said, 'Right is of no sex; truth is of no color, God is the Father of us all--and all are brethren.'

"I know when the subject is related in any way to abortion, the doors of reason and human compassion in our minds and hearts often close, and the humanity of the unborn can sometimes no longer be seen. But this is an issue upon which all Americans should be able to find agreement, regardless of our party affiliations or even our beliefs about abortion.

"Our innate sense of human fairness should make it abundantly clear that aborting a little baby because he or she happens to be black or because he or she has been arbitrarily deemed 'lesser' is fundamentally wrong, representing a betrayal of the precious truth that all men are created equal and are stamped with the Imago Dei on their souls.

"I am convinced this is the civil rights battle that will define our generation, and, by the grace of God, I look forward to this vital measure's consideration on the House floor and its ultimate passage."

The legislation outlaws abortions performed on the basis of the child's sex or race. It also outlaws the coercion of any woman to obtain either a sex- or race-based abortion.  A minority baby is currently five times more likely to be aborted than a white baby, and nearly half of all black babies' are aborted, with over 70 percent of abortion clinics being located in predominantly minority neighborhoods.4

Opponents, prior to the passage of the bill, were unamused by the attempt of pro-life supporters to bring PRENDA to the table.

“Somebody decided politically that it was a difficult place to put people in,” House Democratic Whip Steny Hoyer, D-Md., told reporters Wednesday afternoon. “It’s a political effort, not a substantive effort.”5

The lunacy of the left overwhelms me.

“The Republican majority continues its War on Women in a new and creative way: by attempting to couch legislation that would destroy women’s fundamental constitutional rights as a woman’s rights law. It is cynical, but creative,” Rep. Jerrold Nadler, D-N.Y., said. “The preference for male children is a real, if limited, phenomenon in the United States. Some women face familial and community preference to have male children, and that pressure can increase with each subsequent birth. But this does nothing to help those women.”6

Blind Chinese activist Chen Guangcheng, who spoke out against forced abortions in his native China, captured international headlines this month and GOP aides said the leadership hoped to capitalize on the momentum of that awareness to ensure that sex-selection abortions are not legal in the U.S.7

“For most of us, Mr. Speaker, ‘It’s a girl’ is cause for enormous joy, happiness and celebration,” Rep. Chris Smith, R-N.J., said on the House floor. “But in many countries including our own, it could be a death sentence. Today the three-most dangerous words in China and India are, ‘It’s a girl.’ We can’t let that happen here.”8

As I’ve written previously9, this IS a concern here.  With the release of an undercover video by Live Action10, it is clear that organizations such as Planned Parenthood are at least prepared for women and their partners to ask about such things; we can see that the “workers of iniquity” employed there have no qualms about helping someone obtain a late-term abortion, as most ultrasounds cannot detect the sex of the baby until approximately four or five months into the pregnancy.

Psalm 106:35-40 (KJV)
But were mingled among the heathen, and learned their works.
And they served their idols: which were a snare unto them.
Yea, they sacrificed their sons and their daughters unto devils,
And shed innocent blood, even the blood of their sons and of their daughters, whom they sacrificed unto the idols of Canaan: and the land was polluted with blood.
Thus were they defiled with their own works, and went a whoring with their own inventions.
Therefore was the wrath of the Lord kindled against his people, insomuch that he abhorred his own inheritance.

Proverbs 6:16-17 (KJV)
These six things doth the Lord hate: yea, seven are an abomination unto him:
A proud look, a lying tongue, and hands that shed innocent blood…

Read more on the diseased liberal mindset and watch them REALLY get their knickers in a twist:





4 Ibid
6 Ibid
7 Ibid
8 Ibid

Monday, May 28, 2012

A Miraculous Survival in a World Gone Wrong

By Heather Mathews for PPSIMMONS         


 This world is getting crazier and crazier.

There have been several stories in the media over the last few years about pregnant women, whether innocently going about their business or being somewhere she likely shouldn’t have been, being unfortunate enough to run into someone who doesn’t quite have their head screwed on straight.  These poor women, whether being naïve in their choice of friends or wrongly trusting a stranger who seemed to have their best interests, end up at the receiving end of a brutal attack that puts them in danger of the loss of life and limb, and often the innocent inside them.  Sometimes it is by the very person who is supposed to help protect that innocent.

That’s why today’s news headline, “Pregnant Woman, Unborn Baby Survive Being Abducted, Set on Fire, Shot,”1, 2 is by turns shocking but comforting, discouraging yet hopeful.

The young mother-to-be from Warren, Michigan, after what could only be described as a “date” with her ex-boyfriend (and father of her baby,) dropped the man (if that is what you would want to continue calling him) off at his new girlfriend’s house.  Once inside the garage, she was grabbed by the throat, a gun to her head, and forced to the ground.  Her mouth, hands, and feet were duct-taped and she was blindfolded.  Thrown back into the car and driven to an alley in Detroit, she was told that ‘she knows why’ this was being done to her and asked how far along she was before being set on fire; after managing to put the fire out herself by rolling on the ground, the male assailant shot her in the back.  He took off on foot as the nine-month-pregnant woman played dead.  She got up and drove herself to her mother’s house in Detroit, where she was then taken to a hospital.

That both mother and baby are healthy and expected to survive is nothing short of a miracle.

It does, however, bring up an interesting point about how the liberal-biased media is unable to decide, like their Messiah King Obama, whether or not the unborn are babies with a right to life or a parasite that can be killed up to the moment of birth (see previous post, Obama a Hypocrite on Abortion... Oh, the Irony.)

Commenter “A.D. Roach” seems to have summed it up best:

“So glad to hear of her miraculous escape, and that she and the BABY are going to be ok! However, I thought what she has in her womb is merely a fetal non-person, not a “baby.” It is definitely disingenuous for so many in the news and entertainment media to keep rejoicing over “baby bumps” and the survival of an “unborn baby” while at the same time proclaiming women’s rights to unlimited abortions. So, was this an “unborn baby” who “survived,” or was it a non-personal pre-born fetus without any legitimate expectancy or right to life? Had the “unborn baby” died but the mother did not, would the kidnapper be guilty of murder, or would he only be guilty of performing an abortion without a license? Since apparently the objective of the kidnapping was to prevent another “inconvenient” birth was he not attempting to save the woman and society from having to raise another “unwanted child?…”3

I think that in any case, this woman should be thankful the Lord was watching out for her and her child, and that maybe she should take it not only as a sign of that, but perhaps also a warning that she should be a little more selective regarding a future husband- someone who will be more likely to live his life justified and sanctified.

1 http://news.yahoo.com/pregnant-woman-unborn-baby-survive-being-abducted-set-202233598--abc-news-topstories.html
2 http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/headlines/2012/05/pregnant-woman-unborn-baby-survive-being-abducted-set-on-fire-shot/
3 Ibid

Saturday, May 26, 2012

Using Regret to Warn Against Unrighteousness

By Heather Mathews for PPSIMMONS         


 Gwen and Brad were college athletes, Christians, and were outwardly living their lives righteously.  What their friends and families did not realize was that they not only were sexually active, but they became pregnant and subsequently had an abortion.  Later, they married and had children, but for 15 years they never were quite able to get rid of the guilt- that is, until, Gwen heard someone speak at a women’s meeting about their abortion and the healing process.

“And I sat in the back of the room saying, I can’t believe she’s doing this, that’s so hard, but I saw what God was doing, it was obvious, He was moving, His spirit was moving in the room, and women were, were coming to healing, and, and embracing His grace and forgiveness, and a lot of times we won’t forgive ourselves, but I saw the hand of God move, because she was willing to tell.”

They decided to tell Gwen’s parents and, while shocked, they forgave them.  Now Gwen speaks at conferences and retreats to help women heal from mistakes of the past.

“…It was the deepest regret of my life.  It will always be the deepest regret of my life,” she said.  “Jesus died for every single sin… there are no sins that fall outside the scope of God’s ability to forgive.  And when we understand that, and we understand that when we confess our sin, He is faithful and just to forgive us our sin, and to cleanse us for all of the unrighteousness as the Bible says, that’s when healing begins.”

To watch the video of Gwen’s testimony, go to:



For more stories of regretted abortions, go to:


Another Inspirational Story of Life


By Heather Mathews for PPSIMMONS    

Today I logged into my Facebook account, and in my newsfeed, I saw an article posted by Prophecy News Watch (with a link to the original story on The Christian Post) about a young mother who decided that there was just no way she would abort her baby, even though she and her husband KNEW there was something seriously wrong- they just didn’t know what. 

The mother, Lacey Buchanan, posted her testimonial on YouTube and GodVine and it has already garnered almost ten million hits.

Her son, Christian, who was born on February 18, 2011, was one of only 50 people in the world with a bilateral cleft palate and lip.  He also had clefted eyes, so that he was almost completely blind.

People were cruel to Lacey, whispering behind her back, and asking what was wrong with “that baby.”  One girl even chastised her for not aborting him.  But things began to turn around when people started to recognize her and Christian, and they would tell her how he inspired them:  “What a special child doing big things for God at such an early age. What special parents, to realize God works all things for good for those who love Him. Christian's story touched my heart -- I will pray for your precious miracle. The smile on his face makes me smile :)” says Heather (not me) in a comment on Buchanan's blog.




OR



Original articles:


Friday, May 25, 2012

Winning the War for Babies

By Heather Mathews for PPSIMMONS         


 A Gallup Poll published yesterday1 has renewed hope that people are indeed listening to the pro-life message and are waking up to the fact that babies in utero are, in fact, living human beings and not just a “soulless clump of cells.”  The decline in pro-choice views is seen across the major partisan groups, with an overall decline in the last year from 49 to 41%, and a jump from 45 to 50% identifying as pro-life.

Since last May, Republicans have gained four percentage points among pro-lifers, from 68% to 72%, where pro-choicers have lost 6% (28 to 22 %.)  Among Democrats, pro-life proponents increased from 27 to 34%, and pro-choicers dropped from 68 to 58% in the same period.  Also, Independents who self-identify as pro-life increased from 41 to 47%, and pro-choice supporters dropped from 51 to 41%.  Overall, Americans’ fundamental views on the morality and legality of abortion have held relatively steady, per the corresponding graph.

Personally, I think that last point made by the Gallup organization is misleading.  How can such a large percentage of Americans change their views on whether they are pro-life or pro-choice, yet have no change in their views of the morality of abortion (legality aside)?

Just over half of all respondents answered that abortion should be legal in certain circumstances, holding relatively steady for the last twelve years.  A quarter believe it should be legal in all circumstances, and 20% believe it should be illegal in all cases.

One can only speculate as to exactly why there is such a change of heart in America… could it be the distribution and viewing of media such as the “180” movie2, or the Abort73 website3?  Is it the recent congressional wrangling over federal funding for Planned Parenthood and investigation of their practices?  Is the conflict between the Roman Catholic Church and the Obama Administration4 that has captured their attention and caused them to question their own views and values?  Or perhaps the Lord has tugged at the hearts and minds of the people and convicted them:  we can only hope and pray that this is the case.  Regardless, it is encouraging to see that so many people are finally realizing that using sin to cover sin is never the answer.


1 http://www.gallup.com/poll/154838/Pro-Choice-Americans-Record-Low.aspx
2 http://180movie.com/
3 http://www.abort73.com/
4 http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/religion/9283507/Roman-Catholic-church-in-the-US-launches-legal-assault-on-Barack-Obamas-health-reforms.html

Wednesday, May 23, 2012

Has Michael J. Fox Seen the Light of Day?


By Heather Mathews for PPSIMMONS                                                                                  May 23, 2012



I never purported to be an expert in the various scientific disciplines, but my interest, nonetheless, was a major motivation to get my practical nursing license a few years ago and at least get part-way through my RN degree.  At one point, I was hoping to use it as a stepping stone to eventually end up in medical research.  Alas, plans change.

Despite the change in plans, I still retain at least a nominal interest, particularly where science and God’s plan intersect.  Coupled with my occasional dabbling in the “news” that is Hollyweird, it’s no wonder I was at least a little surprised and a bit vindicated when I saw that actor Michael J. Fox, famous for “Family Ties” and the “Back to the Future” trilogy, now believes the controversial therapy may not ultimately yield a cure for his disease, he told ABC’s Diane Sawyer in an exclusive interview.2

There have been “problems along the way,” Fox said of stem cell studies, for which he has long advocated.   Instead, he said, new drug therapies are showing real promise and are “closer today” to providing a cure for Parkinson’s disease, a degenerative illness that over time causes the body to become rigid and the brain to shut down.3


“Stem cells are an avenue of research that we’ve pursued and continue to pursue but it’s part of a broad portfolio of things that we look at. There have been some issues with stem cells, some problems along the way… It’s not so much that [stem cell research has] diminished in its prospects for breakthroughs as much as it’s the other avenues of research have grown and multiplied and become as much or more promising. So, an answer may come from stem cell research but it’s more than likely to come from another area.”4


I feel for Fox.  While I have been blessed to not have been diagnosed with anything near as devastating as he was back in 1991, I do have a very large extended family, many of whom have Huntington’s disease, another terrible neurodegenerative disorder, and I have seen the effect it has on the family.


How do you, however, justify causing death to save a life?  There is no guarantee that experimenting with the death of the pre-born is going to save a life or cure all cases of a particular disease, but could it theoretically cause some kind of mutation by the combination of non-native DNA in a synthetic manner?  This could even be the case with the usage of adult stem cells (which the article fails to differentiate:) we just don’t know the long-term effects of the usage of allogeneic treatments.  But then again, we DO have the simple medical miracle of blood transfusion.  It just reminds me of experimental chimerism (like I said, I’m NOT a scientist.)  I am heartened by Fox’s recognition that stem cells are not likely to be the holy grail of disease management, and that drug therapies, experimental surgeries, and earlier diagnosis are more probable methods in someday eradicating this disease (prior to the days of Revelation 21:4, anyway.)  Now if only we could convince him that embryonic stem-cell experimentation is not an answer at all.


1 http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0093415/
2 http://news.yahoo.com/blogs/newsmakers/michael-j--fox-looks-past-stem-cells-to-internet-for-parkinson-s-cure.html
3 Ibid
4 Ibid


Additional links:

http://creation.com/stem-cells-and-genesis
http://www.lifenews.com/2012/02/01/komen-also-stops-funding-embryonic-stem-cell-research-centers/
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neurodegeneration

Tuesday, May 22, 2012

The Modern Day Back-Alley Abortion?



By Heather Mathews for PPSIMMONS


An article released last night on WND.com titled Now non-doctors plan stunning evil for babies1 has stirred up some pretty intense feelings on both sides of the abortion argument and in particular has sent shockwaves through pro-life circles.  Apparently, at University of California- San Francisco’s Bixby Center for Global Reproductive Health, there is a taxpayer-funded pilot program training non-physicians to perform first-trimester vacuum aspiration surgical abortions with as little as two-to-five days of training.  Now nurse-practitioners, certified nurse-midwives, and physician assistants in the land of fruits and nuts are being trained to commit government-endorsed murder.

What may or may not be surprising to some is the fact that some states already allow mid-level providers to perform abortion procedures.  Vermont (PAs/NPs,) New York (PAs,) Montana (PAs,) Rhode Island, Connecticut, Washington state (NPs,) Montana (Women’s Health NPs,) Oregon (NPs,) New Jersey, and Illinois allow either surgical abortion or administration of the abortion pill (“medical abortion,”) by such providers.2  California has allowed any medical providers competently trained to perform non-surgical abortions since 2002 (via the Reproductive Privacy Act, SB 1301)3 but this is the first time there was a piece of legislation geared specifically toward training non-physicians to perform surgical abortions.  The legislation is SB 1338- Safe and Early Access bill, introduced by California Sen. Christine Kehoe, D-San Diego. Its sponsors included Planned Parenthood Affiliates of California, and it had the backing of leaders of both houses of the Legislature.4

Now, interesting about this pilot program is that there is a $3.5 million grant from an anonymous donor in addition to taxpayer funds, and Alameda County (which includes most of the East Bay region of the San Francisco Bay Area) Judge Evelio Grillo has, in a May 17 decision, denied a petition for a writ of mandate to disclose the names of physicians, clinicians and stakeholders who participated in the project.5

“[T]he court finds that the public interest in withholding the names of the Clinicians outweighs the public interest in disclosing those names,” the decision states. “First, there is a public interest in protecting persons who provide abortion services from harassment. … Second, the public has an interest in academic research, and that interest may be compromised if research participants cannot participate with the assurance that their privacy will be protected.”6

According to Dana Cody, executive director of Life Legal Defense Foundation, the organization that filed the petition, said, “We feel that the names are necessary because we need to know who’s doing the training. When the project’s own documents show that the injury rate is 80 percent more than when physicians perform abortions, there are some concerns there.”

“The objective is to take them to the Legislature and say, ‘Take a look at these people and who is training,’” she explained. “We suspect from what we have been able to find out that Planned Parenthood is doing the training and another clinic, Women’s Health Services.”
 “There’s a specific case from the California Supreme Court that said – in the identical situation, but it was police officers – the names must be disclosed,” Cody said. “You don’t have to give out personal data, but you must disclose the names. So not only is this not following statute, but it’s not following California Supreme Court case law.” She further added, “It’s just not right. Women deserve better. They deserve better than abortion, and they certainly deserve better than abortion by people who are not trained physicians.”7
A fact sheet released by the Life Legal Defense Foundation, compiled from public records, listed the following bases for their objections: 8

·         The Project was orchestrated not by an independent academic source but by vested interest agents at UCSF’s Bixby Center for Global Reproductive Health, directed by Dr. Philip Darney. The Bixby Center itself was the beneficiary of Project funds. The California Nurses Association has objected that there was no independent peer review of this Project.

·         The Project to train non-physician abortionists was primarily financed by a major ($3.5 million) donor whom UCSF refuses to identify. Why is this donor being kept anonymous? Will it be an embarrassment to the Legislature if/when the identity of the donor who effectively paid for this law is revealed?

·         As to Project expenditures, UCSF/Bixby Center has NOT provided an accounting for 2/3 of the $3.9 million collected for the Project, despite a Public Records Act request.

·         SB 1338 has now been narrowed so that only the 41 persons who participated in the Project will get the benefit of legal protection from prosecution. It is illegal for non-physicians in California to perform surgical abortion. SB 1338 elevates this one privately and anonymously funded project, HWPP #171, to the status of a state policy, determining who is and is not guilty of a crime. This is a bad way to make law.

·         Neither the Medical Board of California nor the Nursing Board had any oversight of the Project.

·         The Project reported in December 2011 an 80% increase in complications when non-physicians performed surgical abortions. No explanation was given as to why complications increased. They reported that these complications included “incomplete abortion, failed abortion, hemorrhage/excessive bleeding, hematometra, infection, cervical injury, and uterine perforation. The non-physicians had a reported 141 total complications for women while the Physicians had 78 complications.

·         The Project reported that several hundred of the patients sampled were deemed ineligible to participate in the Project by the supervising physicians, because of various conditions including medical abnormalities and incomplete surgical or medication abortions. Under SB 1338, there will be no “supervising physician” to screen out these at-risk patients.

·         According to the Project’s “Early Abortion Training Workbook” the entire training period for each non-physician abortionist was only “2-5 days of simulated and hands on training” in order to perform 20-50 first trimester surgical abortions.9

Now, I have nothing against nurse practitioners, physician assistants, and midwives personally; in fact I use an NP instead of a doctor because I have had astoundingly better care and actually got diagnoses where my old doctor said it was “all in my head.”  She will send me to a specialist when the need arises.  However, this is taking a defined standard of practice and turning it on its head.  They are taking accepted State Nurse Practice Acts and throwing them out the window, as well as the practice guidelines of physician assistants.  It is opening a Pandora’s Box, from giving training to nurses and others who have an advanced medical background to eventually allowing anyone who can wield a vacuum tip and has a mediocre knowledge of human anatomy and physiology the ability and right to terminate the life of another human being.  There is a reason only physicians can perform surgery- the YEARS of training!  Once ObamaCare goes into effect, and we see the expected increase of patients running to get medical care, will this cause our primary care providers to be so backed up that they have to pass off “routine” care (as abortion has been described) to lesser-trained health-care workers?  How long before it is registered nurses, then licensed practical/vocational nurses, then certified nurse aides, then the medical office assistant?  Each group is gradually being trained to perform higher level and more complicated duties already: who is to say this won’t eventually become drive-thru type service?  They are risking the health and safety of women in an effort to make this (unfortunately) accepted form of genocide more easily accessible.



6 Ibid
7 Ibid
9 Ibid