By
Heather Mathews for PPSIMMONS May
23, 2012
I never purported to be an expert
in the various scientific disciplines, but my interest, nonetheless, was a
major motivation to get my practical nursing license a few years ago and at
least get part-way through my RN degree.
At one point, I was hoping to use it as a stepping stone to eventually
end up in medical research. Alas, plans
change.
Despite the change in plans, I
still retain at least a nominal interest, particularly where science and God’s
plan intersect. Coupled with my
occasional dabbling in the “news” that is Hollyweird, it’s no wonder I was at
least a little surprised and a bit vindicated when I saw that actor Michael J.
Fox, famous for “Family Ties” and the “Back to the Future” trilogy, now
believes the controversial therapy may not ultimately yield a cure for his
disease, he told ABC’s Diane Sawyer in an exclusive interview.2
“Stem cells are an avenue of research that we’ve pursued and continue to pursue but it’s part of a broad portfolio of things that we look at. There have been some issues with stem cells, some problems along the way… It’s not so much that [stem cell research has] diminished in its prospects for breakthroughs as much as it’s the other avenues of research have grown and multiplied and become as much or more promising. So, an answer may come from stem cell research but it’s more than likely to come from another area.”4
I feel for Fox. While I have been blessed to not have been diagnosed with anything near as devastating as he was back in 1991, I do have a very large extended family, many of whom have Huntington’s disease, another terrible neurodegenerative disorder, and I have seen the effect it has on the family.
How do you, however, justify causing death to save a life? There is no guarantee that experimenting with the death of the pre-born is going to save a life or cure all cases of a particular disease, but could it theoretically cause some kind of mutation by the combination of non-native DNA in a synthetic manner? This could even be the case with the usage of adult stem cells (which the article fails to differentiate:) we just don’t know the long-term effects of the usage of allogeneic treatments. But then again, we DO have the simple medical miracle of blood transfusion. It just reminds me of experimental chimerism (like I said, I’m NOT a scientist.) I am heartened by Fox’s recognition that stem cells are not likely to be the holy grail of disease management, and that drug therapies, experimental surgeries, and earlier diagnosis are more probable methods in someday eradicating this disease (prior to the days of Revelation 21:4, anyway.) Now if only we could convince him that embryonic stem-cell experimentation is not an answer at all.
1 http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0093415/
2 http://news.yahoo.com/blogs/newsmakers/michael-j--fox-looks-past-stem-cells-to-internet-for-parkinson-s-cure.html
3 Ibid
4 Ibid
Additional links:
http://creation.com/stem-cells-and-genesis
http://www.lifenews.com/2012/02/01/komen-also-stops-funding-embryonic-stem-cell-research-centers/
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neurodegeneration
No comments:
Post a Comment